greatbear: (forearms)
Phil ([personal profile] greatbear) wrote2006-12-03 10:08 pm

As seen on teevee

Yesterday I dismantled my stereo system/home theater setup. The 35" Toshiba console TV (yes, an actual console, floor-standing oak veneer cabinet, 350 pounds worth) had not worked properly for many years, defying all of my attempts to make adjustments to correct linearity and convergence issues. In the last couple years, it gave up entirely. Since no one around here watched much TV, it was no big deal. I finally hauled it into the basement, along with the Denon ProLogic receiver, the Sony cassette deck, Yamaha CD changer, Akai DAT deck, the JVC S-VHS VCR, Sansui and Polk speakers, the upright rack and other sundry bits, cables, power controllers and such that filled two decent sized boxes and sequestered it all in the basement for the time being. The receiver, the DVD player and satellite receiver will be the only holdouts from the old setup as I slowly assemble something new. It seems the longer I wait, plasma and LCD televisions get better, cheaper and supposedly longer lasting. I've waited long enough I think, and perhaps over the holidays will pick up a new set. Not sure which brand or technology yet, but I do want something 1080p capable. For those in my readership who are into such things, advice, personal experiences and recommendations are welcome.

The highest resolution TV is desired not just for television/movies, but it will also act as a display for a home theater PC which I have put together recently. The PC will act as the main DVD/CD player as well as a dual-tuner HDTV PVR, video/audio jukebox, multi-room audio source and PC gaming system. It's already proven itself capable of time-shifting television programming while giving good framerates in Doom 3. :)

I acquired a gorgeous, solid walnut credenza/sideboard several years ago when friends of ours moved out of state. The credenza has been sitting in the basement without a proper place upstairs to make use of it. I will attempt to use it as the equipment cabinet, but I hate the thought of cutting into the thing to make way for cabling. Also, it's not deep enough for the receiver or the HTPC. These will have to live out in the open, which overall is fine, since they are the items needing the most ventilation. The rest of the goodies can live inside the very roomy cabinet with the end result being a very versatile system that does not look like my studio setup piled into the living room.

In other news, today was to be the brake upgrade for the Stratus. Unfortunately, I received the wrong brake rotors for the front and had to bail out on that project. I also discovered that the musty smell occasionally inside the car was due to a veritable lake that had formed in the spare tire well in the trunk. This was not the case a few months ago, and damn if I could find out the leak source. Luckily nothing is permanently damaged save for perhaps the carpeting if I cant get the smell out from drying it out and shampooing it. To top it off, I left the ignition on and killed the battery. Being that it's the original, six-and-a-half plus year old battery, most likely that will need a replacement sooner than later. I guess an Optima Red Top battery is in order, since the car will get a nice, killer Alpine system over the holidays. Next up: Car Theater. Go me.

[identity profile] theoctothorpe.livejournal.com 2006-12-04 06:02 am (UTC)(link)
1366 x 768 is 1080i.

Actually, no, it's not... it's "slightly better than 720p" It's technically not a standard HDTV resolution. 480, 720, and 1080 refer to the number of vertical scan lines, regardless of i(nterlaced) or p(rogressive). 1080p is visually superior to 1080i because you don't have image tearing during fast motion, as you do in an interlaced picture (where you're painting the even, then the odd scan lines every 60th of a second (painting a complete picture every 30th)

Here's a good question, and one that I am too lazy to look up. NTSC 480i (aka SDTV) has always been 29.97 FPS (double that to get the scan rate). Now that HDTV is digital, did they finally *kill* 29.97 in favour of 30?

Mind you, no content on the market is 1080p, so it's only worthwhile if you plan on using your monitor with your computer (and you are). Good news on that front, as HDMI to DVI adaptors are cheap, so you don't have to ever deal with an analogue VGA connection.

[identity profile] woofytexan.livejournal.com 2006-12-04 05:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Oops. You're right. I keep confusing the i between interpolate, which I have to use in some of my code for customers to get averages when data is missing from early entries, and interlaced, which i has always stood for in video terminology.
DirecTV "claims" they broadcast some of their HD channels (HDNet and HDShowtime) in 1080p but we do not have 1080p available on our set so I cannot verify this. *sigh*
Maybe Santa will be nice to me this year. *snerk*

[identity profile] theoctothorpe.livejournal.com 2006-12-04 06:40 pm (UTC)(link)
The DirecTV info is potentially good news, although what many do in situations like that is up-convert, often 720p camera-source is up-converted to 1080i for broadcast. Obviously not the best case, but it's an interim step until 1080p cameras are cheaper/more readily available.

I wonder what cameras they're using, if they're actually doing 1080p "real". Perhaps 2-pop has the answer.